316
See copy Order and "and 59 feet of and that those measurements brought him to the South Western "boundary of Lot 38; and that the three measurements of 59 ft. 11/62° 59 ftg" and 4ft 2 inch when added together give 126ft q. the exact lease measurement of Lot 38.
#
Lot
In arriving at this measurement of 126ft q. Mr Vanby measures along the "outside or Southern side of the Wall running along the Southerer side of Lot "38. and M. Stefchons state's the bree Southech boundary of that Lot runs to
of t
From the above it will be seen that the Price was not attempting to mark out the line of demarcation, but only to prove that the boundary line between Lots "185. and 38. and Lot 1844. could not on Mr. Camby's own evidence out the Southern
said it does.
boundary of the lots at the point at which tra Canby has fixed his line.
"Under these circumstances I have to report that Mr.
of demarcation, and that Me Price has objected to its accuracy for the reasons given above.
Seal of Supreme Court (Hongkong)
(M.) Alfred G. Wise
Acting Registrar
May 14th. 1885.
1. By order of Court in Chambers dated the 4th day of September 1885 and made by the Honorable Mr. Ackroyd Registrar of the Supreme Court then Acting Puisne Judge and as such Acting Chief Justice during the absence of the Chief Justice it was ordered that the Acting Registrar's Report be confirmed and that the line fixed by Mr Vanly and in the said Report mentioned be the boundary between Marine Lots No. 184. and 185. and Inland Lot N. 38. and that the Plaintiffs be put into possession by the Bailiff of that Honorable Court of the Land which by the Judgment of that Honorable Court delivered the day of March last was declared to belong to the Plaintiffs,
14. In pursuance of this Order the Bailiff on the 9th day of October 1885 as appears by the Order of the Supreme Court of Hongkong dated, the 7th day of September 1885 and Bailiff's return of the said Bailiff's return endorsed thereon a certified copy of which order and annexed.
Page 10 post. "retion are hereunto annexed attended with the Plaintiffs Solicitor upon the ground? and taking down the division fence between the Plaintiffs Marine Lot N. 15. and your Petitioners Marine Lot. N° 184. entered into the Land of your Petitioner and took possession of so much there of as Mr Vanly (not on oath and without measurements
{
316
See copy Order and
"and 59 feet of and that those measurements brought him to the South Wastern "boundary of Lot 38; and that the three measurements of 59 ft. 11/62° 59 ftg" and 4ft 2 inch when added together give 126eft q. the exact lease measurement of Lot 38.
#
Lot
In arriving at this measurement of 126ft q. Mr Vanby measures along the "outside or Southern side of the Wall running along the Southerer side of 2 "38. and M. Stefchons state's the bree Southech boundary of that Lot runs to
of t
From the above it will be seen that the Price was not attempting to mark out the line of deurarcation, but only to prove that the boundary line between Lots "185. and 38. and Lot 1844. could not on Mr. Camby's own evidence out the Southern
said it does.
boundary of the lots at the point at which tra Canby has fixed his line.
"Under these circumstances I have to report that Mr.
of demarcation, and that Me Price has objected to its accuracy for the reasons
given above. Seal of Supreme Court
(Hongkong)
(M.) Alfred G. Wise
Acting Regishär
May 144. 1885.-
1. By order of leourt in Chambers dated the 4th day of September 1885 and made
by the Honorable Mr. Ackroyd Registrar of the Supreme Court then Ading Puione Sudge and as such Ading bhief Justice during the absence of the Chief Justice it was ordered that the Aclting Registrars Report be confirmed and that the live. fixed by Mr Vanly and in the said Report mentioned be the boundary between Marine Lots No. 184. and 185. and Inland Lot N. 38. and that the Plaintiffs be put into possession by the Bailiff of that Honorable Court of the Land which by the Judgment of that Honorable Court delivered bh day of March thin last was declared to belong to the Maintiffs,
14. In pursuance of this Order the Bailiff on the 9th day of October 1885 as
appears by
the Order of the Supreme Court of Hongkong dated, the 7th day of September 185 and Bailiffs return of the said Bailiffs return endorsed thereon a certified copy of which order and annexed. Page 10 post. "retion are hereunto annexed attended with the Plaintiffs Solicitor upon the ground? and taking downe the division fence between the Olgintiffs Marine Fot N. 15. and your Petitioners Marine Lot. N° 184. entered into the Land of your Petitioner and took possession of so much there of as Mr Vanly (not on bath and without measurements
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.